Bug 10281 - lsblk does not compile for util-linux
Summary: lsblk does not compile for util-linux
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: buildroot
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Other (show other bugs)
Version: 2017.05.1
Hardware: All All
: P5 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Carlos Santos
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2017-08-30 20:06 UTC by adyke
Modified: 2017-10-13 13:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Host:
Target:
Build:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description adyke 2017-08-30 20:06:29 UTC 
lsblk is not compiled with util-linux

Commit 031659024b3cf27bb68dc58d07519b563ef472a1 indicates the BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_LSBLK option was removed when upgrading to util-linux 2.28.2 since that version always built lsblk. 
However, in when using buildroot 2017.05.2 (which uses util-linux 2.29.2) lsblk is not built.
Comment 1 Carlos Santos 2017-08-31 13:31:56 UTC 
The "lsblk" utility is part of the "basic set", now. Ensure that you have BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_BINARIES selected.

If this does not work then please run "make BR2_DEFCONFIG=/tmp/my-defconfig savedefconfig" and attach the resulting /tmp/my-defconfig to this bug report, so I can try to reproduce the problem here.
Comment 2 Carlos Santos 2017-08-31 13:38:01 UTC 
I just noticed that commit 031659024b3cf27bb68dc58d07519b563ef472a1 did not add the required entries in Config.in.legacy for BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_FINDFS and BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_LSBLK selecting BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_BINARIES.
Comment 3 Carlos Santos 2017-10-13 13:38:13 UTC 
No answer from the submitter in more than 30 days. Closing as invalid, since lsblk is enabled by the "basic set" option, as already explained.