| Summary: | libglib2 autoreconf | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | buildroot | Reporter: | Lionel Landwerlin <llandwerlin> |
| Component: | Other | Assignee: | unassigned |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | minor | CC: | buildroot |
| Priority: | P5 | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Host: | x86-64 | Target: | SH4 |
| Build: | |||
| Attachments: |
Gtk-doc patch for libglib2
Autoreconf for libglib2 fix |
||
|
Description
Lionel Landwerlin
2009-07-13 19:01:10 UTC
Created attachment 459 [details]
Gtk-doc patch for libglib2
Why is the patch applied to the dbus-glib package to fix an issue in libglib2 ? (In reply to comment #2) > Why is the patch applied to the dbus-glib package to fix an issue in libglib2 ? > Sorry, I made a wrong commit on my repository... It was late... Please find a correct one as attachment. Thx for review. Created attachment 481 [details]
Autoreconf for libglib2 fix
Is this patch upstream ? (In reply to comment #5) > Is this patch upstream ? > It's 2 commit from upstream (ea536503331aea875e84ae598b4610fbd059f167) http://git.gnome.org/cgit/glib/commit/?id=ea536503331aea875e84ae598b4610fbd059f167 doesn't seem to exist. Am I looking at the wrong place ? (In reply to comment #7) > http://git.gnome.org/cgit/glib/commit/?id=ea536503331aea875e84ae598b4610fbd059f167 > doesn't seem to exist. Am I looking at the wrong place ? > I was giving you a buildroot hash, I think you missed something. Most of packages using gtk-doc (libglib2, libgtk2, etc...) to generate their documentation need the gtk-doc m4 macros to be reconfigured. This patch adds the gtk-doc m4 that are not available because gtk-doc is not a part of buildroot. Regards, > I was giving you a buildroot hash, I think you missed something. No, I don't think so. When I asked if this patch was upstream, I was asking if the patch has been integrated in glib2 by glib2 developers in the official version, of if it was in the process of being integrated. I was referring to this meaning of upstream: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upstream_%28software_development%29 Thanks for your contribution! This problem has been fixed by 61f677cb060732316b41f072210986e97ae9379f. |